(b) any other exemption to which he may be entitled, including the reimbursement of the bonds he has paid or paid, if his right to a special benefit is denied. Section 16 (c) of the Act, as amended by the Specific Relief (Amendment) Act of 2018, no longer requires the applicant to assume availability and availability, as a mantra in the application previously requires. However, I think it is imperative that the applicant prove that he has already fulfilled the essential conditions of the contract or that he has always been willing and willing to apply the contractual terms he must apply. This can only be done if the claimant`s right exposes and discloses in the obligation to appeal facts that reveal availability, availability and benefit. Consistent case law suggests that the evidence is not in a position to violate the briefs, so sufficient briefs would still be required to allow the Court to draw the elements of the amended Section 16, that is, proof of availability and availability or performance. Despite the above amendments, the courts continue to review the following well-established criteria and principles, while granting or denying a defined benefit. “16. In an appeal against the particular performance of the sale contract, which stipulates that, upon the execution of the deed of sale, the property is handed over to the purchaser, it is implied that the transfer of the property to the property is part of the decree of the special execution of the contract. In this context, however, it is appropriate to refer to Section 22 of the Special Landfill Act 1963. ………. It is necessary that the conduct of an applicant in the performance of the contract or the attempt to accomplish the same thing must demonstrate an unwavering intention to want the Serden. The Supreme Court, in paragraph 12 of aniglase Yohannan v.
Ramlatha, estimated it to be 17. It can be shown that the subsection (1) is an enabling provision. An applicant in a special benefit remedy may apply for additional facilities mentioned in clauses (a) and b). The clause (a) includes, in addition to special benefits, facilities of ownership and division as well as separate assets. The mandate of Section 22, sub-section 22, is that the Tribunal does not grant discharge under clauses (a) and (b) subsection (1), unless it has been the subject of an express request. It follows that no jurisdiction may grant exemption from ownership of real estate or other property subject to the sale agreement for which a defined benefit is claimed, unless the property is expressly sought.Â There are two types of post-stop relief for the special benefit, which one of the contracting parties can benefit from in the right case – What factors a court takes into account in deciphering the granting or denial of a particular benefit  Section 20. Replacement of the contract. – (1) Without prejudice to the universality of the provisions of the Indian Contract Act of 1872 (9 of 1872) and , unless the parties agree otherwise if the contract is broken because of the non-compliance of a party`s commitments, the party who suffers from that violation has the option of replacing the benefit with a third party or a separate agency. , and, the costs and other costs actually incurred, spent or incurred by the party that commits such a violation.